I dissect President Trump’s 2017 UNGA speech and discuss the ironic backlash to the Kirkpatrickian philosophy of “principled realism” that backed it during the below interview with Keith Hanson on WNTK beginning at 2:53:
Tag: Jeane Kirkpatrick
As we move into the Donald J. Trump presidency, here is a round-up of recent pieces on the national interest-oriented, Kirkpatrickian national security and foreign policy that President-Elect Trump’s team is primed to implement:
- Don’t listen to the lyin’ media. THIS is what Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn believes
- ICYMI, check out Gen. Kelly’s solid preview of Trump’s homeland security policy
- Tillerson testimony shows Trump will gut Obama’s pro-Muslim Brotherhood foreign policy
And here are a couple of pieces on the lessons of President-Elect Trump that would benefit all Republicans and conservatives:
- Why the GOP should follow Trump’s lead and harness the power of narratives
- Another Trump lesson for Republicans: Do not give your critics an inch
On this Veterans Day, I wanted to share my vision for how to honor the sacrifices of our soldiers — namely by pursuing a foreign policy that puts their lives, and America’s national interest, first.
I lay out four principles for achieving this in my latest work at Conservative Review, which you can read here.
As I write in the piece:
There are several things that we as Americans ought to demand of our civilian leaders on behalf of our troops, including among them:
- A foreign policy based in America’s national interest that does not result in the arming of those who wish to undermine us either directly or through destabilizing regimes that suppress such enemies;
- A clear and logical justification for American interventions overseas, replete with a rationale cost-benefit analysis that looks at the peoples with whom we are engaging without politically correct blinders, and cogent exit strategy;
- The abolition of suicidal rules of engagement that leave our troops vulnerable while protecting the enemy;
- An end to social engineering of the armed forces — militaries exist to destroy enemies and defend shores, they are not playthings for progressives
We should be humanitarians towards our citizens first. Part of that includes not putting them in harm’s way to achieve abstract pipe-dreams overseas, the failures of which accrue to the benefits of our enemies.
On this Veterans Day, let us resolve to embrace a path that makes our troops’ sacrifices worthwhile.
Featured Image: U.S. Army Cpl. Robert Graves kneels while providing security as the 401st Military Police Company walks through the village of Udkheyl, Logar province, Afghanistan, on July 7, 2010. (Defense.gov/Wikimedia Commons)
I recently had the opportunity to speak at length with Republican Presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz’s national security and foreign policy brain trust, Dr. Victoria Coates, on behalf of Encounter Books in connection with the release of her intellectually stimulating and compelling new David’s Sling: A History of Democracy in Ten Works of Art.
During our extensive interview — which you can listen to in full or in parts per the below — we discuss the indelible link between democracy and creativity, the significance of great works of art and architecture in the history of freedom from Michelangelo’s David to the Parthenon and Picasso’s Guernica, why the entrepreneurial art community endorses political stances anathema to the freedom that sustains it, and everything you would ever want to know about Sen. Ted Cruz’s foreign policy vision. On this latter point, among other subjects, Dr. Coates and I discuss the principles that form the Cruz Doctrine, who in the foreign policy sphere truly carries the mantle of Jeanne Kirkpatrick, what “winning” in the Middle East would look like for America under a President Cruz, Saudi Arabia vs. Iran, whether America has a responsibility under NATO to defend an Islamic supremacist Turkish regime against Russia, how a President Cruz would handle an ascendant Russia, the long-term threat posed by China and how to counter her, the greatest threat to America’s national interest we are most underestimating or ignoring, and much more.